<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Relentless Economics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.relentlesseconomics.com/?feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.relentlesseconomics.com</link>
	<description>Linda Nazareth&#039;s Relentless Economics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 18:39:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Demographics and Your Investments &#8211; Part III</title>
		<link>http://www.relentlesseconomics.com/?p=425</link>
		<comments>http://www.relentlesseconomics.com/?p=425#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 19:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Linda Nazareth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Demographics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.relentlesseconomics.com/?p=425</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.relentlesseconomics.com/?p=425"><img align="left" hspace="5" width="150" height="150" src="http://www.relentlesseconomics.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/mycdaus1-150x150.jpg" class="alignleft wp-post-image tfe" alt="" title="mycdaus[1]" /></a>Last time, I talked about who the middle-young ratio (ratio of 40somethings to 20somethings in the population) correlated with financial market activity in the U.S. and Canada. A population with a lot of 40somethings poured money into the stock markets through the 1990s, then a slightly older one held back a little on equities. The [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.relentlesseconomics.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=425</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Demographics and Your Investments:Part II</title>
		<link>http://www.relentlesseconomics.com/?p=411</link>
		<comments>http://www.relentlesseconomics.com/?p=411#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 14:12:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Linda Nazareth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Baby boomers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Demographics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.relentlesseconomics.com/?p=411</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.relentlesseconomics.com/?p=411"><img align="left" hspace="5" width="150" height="150" src="http://www.relentlesseconomics.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/MYUS2-150x150.jpg" class="alignleft tfe wp-post-image" alt="MYUS" title="MYUS" /></a>Aging population – market time bomb?   Okay, that’s a sensationalistic way to put it, but that’s certainly one of the fears people have about an the shifting demographics in North America. Last time around I looked at how portfolio size tends to trend lower as people go past 65. All things being equal, the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.relentlesseconomics.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=411</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Demographics and Your Investments &#8211; Part I</title>
		<link>http://www.relentlesseconomics.com/?p=401</link>
		<comments>http://www.relentlesseconomics.com/?p=401#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 18:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Linda Nazareth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Baby boomers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Demographics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Generations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aging population]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demographics and investments]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.relentlesseconomics.com/?p=401</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.relentlesseconomics.com/?p=401"><img align="left" hspace="5" width="119" height="131" src="http://www.relentlesseconomics.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/oldguy.jpg" class="alignleft tfe wp-post-image" alt="oldguy" title="oldguy" /></a>Demographic shifts are going to shake up your portfolio. Part I: How portfolios change over a lifetime.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.relentlesseconomics.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=401</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tiger Mom and Slacker Parents</title>
		<link>http://www.relentlesseconomics.com/?p=395</link>
		<comments>http://www.relentlesseconomics.com/?p=395#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 19:50:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Linda Nazareth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amy chau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Generations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labor market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tiger mom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.relentlesseconomics.com/?p=395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.relentlesseconomics.com/?p=395"><img align="left" hspace="5" width="150" src="http://www.tattoo3designs.com/data/thumbnails/17/tiger_mom.jpg" class="alignleft wp-post-image tfe" alt="" title="Tiger Mom" /></a>Tiger Mom book will sound good to parents of Gen Ys and Gen Zs.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.relentlesseconomics.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=395</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Uh. Oh, high oil prices=recession</title>
		<link>http://www.relentlesseconomics.com/?p=394</link>
		<comments>http://www.relentlesseconomics.com/?p=394#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2011 19:16:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Linda Nazareth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.relentlesseconomics.com/?p=394</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.relentlesseconomics.com/?p=394"><img align="left" hspace="5" width="150" height="150" src="http://www.relentlesseconomics.com/wp-content/plugins/thumbnail-for-excerpts/tfe_no_thumb.png" class="alignleft wp-post-image tfe" alt="" title="" /></a>well maybe &#8211; but not neccessarily. See my blog for the bnn site at http://www.bnn.ca/Blogs/2011/01/07/Match-made-in-heaven-Oil-prices-and-US-recessions.aspx]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.relentlesseconomics.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=394</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Moving, but Not Up</title>
		<link>http://www.relentlesseconomics.com/?p=374</link>
		<comments>http://www.relentlesseconomics.com/?p=374#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 01:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Linda Nazareth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor Force]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.relentlesseconomics.com/?p=374</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.relentlesseconomics.com/?p=374"><img align="left" hspace="5" width="150" height="150" src="http://www.relentlesseconomics.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/moving1-150x150.gif" class="alignleft tfe wp-post-image" alt="moving" title="moving" /></a>I like offbeat economic indicators &#8211; the number of boats or RVs sold, what colors are in the crayon box, etc. etc. A lot of time they tell you what is going on just as well as some of the stuffier stuff  (y&#8217;know, GDP and all that)  that we all track every day.  So I was [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.relentlesseconomics.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=374</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>After the Fall</title>
		<link>http://www.relentlesseconomics.com/?p=366</link>
		<comments>http://www.relentlesseconomics.com/?p=366#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 15:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Linda Nazareth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic collapse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pew financial reform project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[swagel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wealth]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.relentlesseconomics.com/?p=366</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.relentlesseconomics.com/?p=366"><img align="left" hspace="5" width="150" height="150" src="http://www.relentlesseconomics.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/falling-money1-150x150.jpg" class="alignleft tfe wp-post-image" alt="falling-money" title="falling-money" /></a>Now that the U.S. economy looks a just a teensy bit better (I know, I know the National Bureau of Economic Research won&#8217;t say that the recession is over, but still) it&#8217;s probably okay to start adding up the cost of the crisis. The Pew Research Institute has a new study out that does just [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.relentlesseconomics.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=366</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s Up Doc?</title>
		<link>http://www.relentlesseconomics.com/?p=350</link>
		<comments>http://www.relentlesseconomics.com/?p=350#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 22:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Linda Nazareth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[careers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doctors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[generations and medicine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.relentlesseconomics.com/?p=350</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.relentlesseconomics.com/?p=350"><img align="left" hspace="5" width="150" height="150" src="http://www.relentlesseconomics.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/doctor-150x150.jpg" class="alignleft tfe wp-post-image" alt="doctor" title="doctor" /></a>Okay, this one seemed a little out of sync for me: doctors would apparently be employees than free agents. Or at least that&#8217;s what the New York Times says, in this article that was splashed across the front of the  business page. According to the Medical Group Management Association, in 2005 about two-thirds of medical [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.relentlesseconomics.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=350</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Jobs Boom &#8211; But Not for Everyone</title>
		<link>http://www.relentlesseconomics.com/?p=335</link>
		<comments>http://www.relentlesseconomics.com/?p=335#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 13:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Linda Nazareth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Demographics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Generations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor Force]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.relentlesseconomics.com/?p=335</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.relentlesseconomics.com/?p=335"><img align="left" hspace="5" width="150" height="150" src="http://www.relentlesseconomics.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/nurse_jackie2-150x150.jpg" class="alignleft tfe wp-post-image" alt="NURSE JACKIE" title="NURSE JACKIE" /></a>Oh the labor shortage thing: it get dredged up every so often, and not without cause. We all know the theory behind it, more or less. The boomers are aging, and they are going ot exit the labor force. The generation coming up behind them was not nearly as plentiful in numbers, so they won&#8217;t [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.relentlesseconomics.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=335</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Generous Generations</title>
		<link>http://www.relentlesseconomics.com/?p=327</link>
		<comments>http://www.relentlesseconomics.com/?p=327#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 04:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Linda Nazareth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Demographics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Generations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philantrophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[convio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[generation y]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[generations and charity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.relentlesseconomics.com/?p=327</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.relentlesseconomics.com/?p=327"><img align="left" hspace="5" width="150" height="150" src="http://www.relentlesseconomics.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/pig2-150x150.jpg" class="alignleft tfe wp-post-image" alt="42-15440756" title="42-15440756" /></a>Here&#8217;s an interesting study (by non-profit consultants Convio)  on how the different U.S. generations are doling out money to charity.  Turns out that everybody is still pretty generous in their giving (recession or no recession), but that not all charities are doing a good job in reaching the people that might write the checks. Actually, not all [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.relentlesseconomics.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=327</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

